Contract4Deed

California · land contract

California land contract, explained.

A plain-English guide to land contract (also called contract for deed) in California — statute, recording, default remedies, interest caps, and where deals actually happen.

Last reviewed 2026-04-30.
Governing statute

Cal. Civ. Code §§ 2985-2985.6 (real property sales contracts); Cal. Civ. Code § 2924 et seq. (deed-of-trust foreclosure framework, sometimes applied by analogy)

Recording

Section 2985.5 expressly authorizes recording. Buyer (or seller) may record the executed contract or a memorandum in the county recorder's office where the property lies; no statutory deadline, but recording is essential to give constructive notice. Standard county recording fees plus SB2 ($75) building-homes-and-jobs fee where applicable.

Default remedy

Hybrid trending strongly toward foreclosure-style treatment. California courts routinely re-characterize installment land contracts as equitable mortgages (Petersen v. Hartell, 40 Cal.3d 102 (1985)); strict forfeiture is generally unenforceable where the buyer has substantial equity. Seller typically must judicially foreclose or accept buyer's right to cure / redeem.

Is land contract legal in California?

Recognized and statutorily defined as a 'real property sales contract' under Civil Code § 2985 - an agreement in which one party agrees to convey title to real property upon satisfaction of specified conditions and which does not require conveyance within one year of formation.

How do you record a land contract agreement in California?

Section 2985.5 expressly authorizes recording. Buyer (or seller) may record the executed contract or a memorandum in the county recorder's office where the property lies; no statutory deadline, but recording is essential to give constructive notice. Standard county recording fees plus SB2 ($75) building-homes-and-jobs fee where applicable.

What happens if the buyer defaults?

Hybrid trending strongly toward foreclosure-style treatment. California courts routinely re-characterize installment land contracts as equitable mortgages (Petersen v. Hartell, 40 Cal.3d 102 (1985)); strict forfeiture is generally unenforceable where the buyer has substantial equity. Seller typically must judicially foreclose or accept buyer's right to cure / redeem.

What is the maximum interest rate?

Constitutional usury limit: 10% per annum for personal/family/household loans, or the higher of 10% or the Federal Reserve discount rate plus 5% for other loans (Cal. Const. art. XV § 1). Many seller-financed transactions are exempt under the seller-carryback exemption.

What disclosures are required?

Civil Code § 2985.3 - § 2985.6 require seller to deliver, before execution, a statement disclosing prior encumbrances, terms of any senior loans, late-charge provisions, balloon notice, and a statement that the contract is being recorded. Standard Transfer Disclosure Statement (Civ. Code § 1102) and Natural Hazard Disclosure also apply for 1-4 unit residential.

Who's protected — buyer vs. seller

Buyer protections

Equitable-mortgage doctrine (Petersen v. Hartell) bars forfeiture where buyer has paid substantial equity; right to cure; mandatory written disclosures of senior liens; balloon-payment 90-150 day advance notice (Civ. Code § 2966) for loans over 5 years on 1-4 unit residences; statutory recording right.

Seller protections

Right to retain title until full performance; ability to bring quiet-title or specific-performance action; in clear default with minimal buyer equity, possible forfeiture; ability to assign payments; acceleration on default if drafted.

Where in the state do these deals happen?

Rural and agricultural parcels in Central Valley and Sierra foothills; subdivided lots; multi-year option-to-purchase deals; some urban infill where seller wants tax-deferral. Less common for owner-occupied homes due to equitable-mortgage exposure.

California cities

Per-city market notes for land contract buyers and sellers.

Notable case law

Petersen v. Hartell, 40 Cal.3d 102 (1985); MacFadden v. Walker, 5 Cal.3d 809 (1971); Venable v. Harmon, 233 Cal.App.2d 297 (1965).

Looking at a California deal?

Send the parcel and the terms — we'll walk through whether land contract fits, how to record it, and what the cure period looks like if things go sideways.

Talk to Wyatt

Educational content only. Statute citations are public-record research, not legal advice. California contracts and remedies are fact-specific — consult a licensed California real-estate attorney before signing anything.